In 1959 Berry Gordy founded Motown Records. This year is the 50th anniversary of what I consider to be the greatest record label in pop music history. The beauty of Motown rests in its general commitment to a Fordist model of music production which values specialized talents over the omni-talented-singer-songwriter-folk-myth that has been flinging mediocrity in our faces since 1975.
With a few notable exceptions, he or she who is the better singer, is not the best lyricist. The great lyricist is not usually the great composer. The great composer is not the great musician and so on. And yet, because we so comically personalize music (oh my god, it’s like Fiona Apple knows me), we place irrational value in the notion that the musician’s final product as a pure, untampered with expression of the artists’ inner soul. Despite aggressive marketing to the contrary, this is almost never the case.
For anyone who ever thought two seconds about it, it would be obvious that pop music is, and ought to be, a collaborative and technical effort. I don’t want the same person working at all levels of production just as I wouldn’t want to watch the a Martin Scorsese film, starring Martin Scorsese, score by Martin Scorsese, edited by Martin Scorsese. Imagine the pathetic state of the film industry if it labored under the same stigma the music industry must! Of course I’m aware that very few films are great, but pound-for-pound, it remains one of our more thriving mediums and that it also has a strong tradition (necessity) of artistic delegation is not coincidental.
This pop music folk myth also tends to favor the medium of The Album as opposed to the generally superior and more endearingly humble “single”. How many artists really merit the event of The Album? Most would be better suited to just write songs and release them as singles, and only if they have a solid enough run to necessitate it, compile a “best of” ten years down the road thus actually ensuring the consumer that their $15 will be well spent. This I propose as an alternative to the crap-shoot we’re expected to make when we hear a promising single on the radio and must take our chances when we lay down some serious cash for a Natalie Imbruglia CD.
The self-righteousness just oozing from every syllable of the hipper-than-thou LP collector’s tight lips “I prefer to listen to the whole album as one piece–the way the artist intended”, makes me want to slit my wrists with their record needle.
Berry Gordy got all of this and that’s why my favorite Motown act, the Supremes, stand up as a pop group of such colossal stature (they are but one of a startling catalog of acts about whom the same could be written). Their singles collection (many albums worth), boasts the transcendent work of a collaboration of geniuses, and packs a punch nearly unmatched. For our women’s interest bent, let it be once more stated that Motown was built on the backs of The Supremes and other women (Martha and the Vandellas, The Marevellettes, The Velvettes ), who topped the unprecedented dominance of women on the pop music charts in the early years of Motown and mid-to-late years of Brill Building. This was the great era of the pop single, which, thanks to file downloading, is the unit of pop music once more.

6 comments
Comments feed for this article
January 11, 2009 at 5:14 pm
Anonymous
I think you’re missing something. Songwriting by necessity involves singing. Each time you attempt to write, your hands are physically on your instrument and you’re actively singing. The more you write, the more you become a better singer and instrumentalist. The two activities are very tightly interwoven.
The problem with the genre is not so much that taking an auteur approach to music downgrades it, as that claiming the singer/songwriter label when you’re really pretty much just a singer or songwriter downgrades it.
January 11, 2009 at 5:16 pm
Anonymous
Ahem, I meant “pretty much just a singer downgrades it”.
January 12, 2009 at 6:06 am
Anonymous
As far as singles vs. albums go, it all depends on the individual artist. If I’m listening to the latest rock or pop song, I’ll just listen to it on it’s own because the album is probably not going to be all that great and isn’t intended to be a cohesive whole. If we’re talking about, say, Muse or Radiohead on the other hand, I think the full effect can only be derived from the entire work. I’m mostly one of those tight-lipped “I prefer to hear the entire album” types, but not so much that I look down on casual listeners or make “sheeple” part of my vocabulary.
January 12, 2009 at 11:43 am
Pop Feminist
You both make valid points. It’s probably true that songwriters tend to be better at singing and playing instruments, but I’m still going to stand by my account that there are probably *better yet* instrumentalists or singers out there. It does depend on the music you’re making. I certainly wouldn’t want Paul singing all of John’s songs because he’s a “better” singer in the most technical sense. All of these value-laden terms are subjective of course. Some would say that Diana Ross is a horrible singer/performer next to Aretha Franklin for example (who also didn’t write her music).
As for albums vs. singles– again, good point. There are artists who merit THE ALBUM, but I think the imperative for all artists to release one should be abolished. Some are really poorly suited to the medium. The standard should be singles– the exception should be the album.
January 12, 2009 at 4:11 pm
Sarah J
I think that with the iTunesification of the music industry, albums are dying anyway and we will be returning to the single as the standard.
I’m one of those people who still remembers the switch to CDs from cassettes fondly, and I enjoy buying albums and even still buy the CDs (hell, I still buy used vinyl records even though I currently don’t have a record player). But I tend to buy things almost unheard, because I like the band (like I’ll run right out and buy the new Nick Cave album, because it’s Nick Cave) rather than because I heard one song in a club or god forbid, on the radio.
I wonder if the rise of Internet radio will also help the comeback of the single. Because aside from the few pop tracks that get ridiculous amounts of airplay, it’s damn hard to discover new bands through the radio these days. I mean, I remember hearing “Smells Like Teen Spirit” on the radio and having my mind blown, just a bit.
January 24, 2009 at 7:15 am
queen emily
I agree, largely.
This argument’s been going on, since about forever. Given the level of technological mediation of just about every track on the radio of every genre now (Autotune, Pro Tools etc) the auteurist argument about expression or some such is pretty much flawed. Honestly, how can you tell, and what does it matter?
Course, I would say that, given my love of Spector, Motown and Girls Aloud ^_^
Also, the argument that songwriting makes you a better singer is.. uh. flawed. There’s a whole rich tradition of interpretation that predates the folk/rock dominant narrative of singer-songwriter. eg jazz standards, where everyone has a crack at a song. Billie Holliday’s genius wasn’t in her songwriting, it was in her phrasing and the way she interpreted songs.
Last, I think it’s interesting that hip-hop is making the album a relic in a different way (the opposite really) – through artists releasing such a deluge of music on mixtapes that “the album” seems a waste of time if you’ve already downloaded the mixtapes.